Skip to Content

Ancient Greek Wisdom Thought-Provoking Journey into Love and Philosophy by Plato

Delve into the profound world of ancient Greek philosophy with our exploration of Plato’s ‘The Symposium.’ Discover timeless insights into love, passion, and intellectual discourse that will captivate your mind.

Embark on this intellectual voyage and uncover the secrets of ancient Greek wisdom. Keep reading to gain a deeper understanding of love’s philosophical nuances.

Ancient Greek Wisdom Thought-Provoking Journey into Love and Philosophy by Plato

Genres

Philosophy, Classics, Love, Ancient Greece, Literature, Symposium, Dialogue, Socratic Method, Wisdom, Intellectual Discourse

Review

The Symposium (c. 385–370 BC) invites you on an exploration of love through a series of speeches at an Athenian feast. You’ll engage with the timeless insights of ancient Greek intellectuals as they delve into the nature and purpose of love – and, in the process, unpack love’s relation to desire, connection, wisdom, and beauty.

In ‘The Symposium,’ Plato orchestrates a captivating dialogue among notable ancient Greek figures, exploring the multifaceted nature of love. Each speaker contributes a unique perspective, creating a tapestry of philosophical ideas that transcends time. From the playful banter to profound insights, the text invites readers to reflect on the essence of love and its connection to broader philosophical concepts.

Plato’s ‘The Symposium’ remains a timeless masterpiece, showcasing his brilliance in orchestrating philosophical dialogues. The exploration of love through diverse viewpoints adds depth to the narrative, making it a must-read for anyone interested in ancient Greek philosophy. The interplay of ideas and the eloquence of the speakers contribute to a thought-provoking experience that lingers in the reader’s mind. A profound journey into the intellectual landscape of ancient Greece, this work exemplifies the enduring power of philosophical discourse.

Introduction: Uncover ancient Greek insights into the nature of love and desire

When it comes to ancient Greek philosophers, there are few names as famous as Plato. In fact, it’s not that much of a stretch to say without him, European philosophy would look very different today. And of his many surviving works, the Symposium stands out as a true testament to his profound insights into the human condition.

The work is more than a mere philosophical treatise – its ideas are presented via a series of dialogues taking place at an ancient Athenian feast, each one offering a distinct perspective on love. This interesting approach helps Plato explore the concept from different angles. It also places love as not only a philosophical idea, but as a dynamic force that can be found in all human interactions.

Despite its age, the Symposium still remains hugely relevant for modern audiences. In this summary, prepare to engage not only in ancient philosophical thought – but also with ideas that challenge and enlighten our understanding of love today.

Phaedrus’s take on love and mythology

We start our journey into the Symposium with the first dialogue, presented by Phaedrus – a figure known for his intellectualism and fiery rhetoric. To set the scene, imagine the relaxing yet intellectually stimulating atmosphere of a symposium: an ancient Greek gathering for exchanging ideas and festive celebrations. It’s in this context that Phaedrus steps forward to open the series of encomia, or laudatory speeches dedicated to exploring the nature of something. Today, that something is eros, the ancient Greek term encompassing love and desire.

Phaedrus, who comes from a wealthy Athenian family, is known for his clever argumentation and his interest in both natural science and philosophy. And his tendency toward intellectualism is clearly evident in his speech – it’s not just casual musings, but well-rehearsed, thoughtfully prepared expositions. The approach he’s taking is one that connects ancient myths with poetic references; in doing so, he sets the stage for the dialogues that follow.

As his discourse gets underway, Phaedrus makes a bold assertion: eros is the oldest of all the gods, and a powerful force that wields immense power over both human and divine affairs. But his claim isn’t only speculative – he backs it up with examples from myth and legend, drawing from stories of figures like Alcestis, Orpheus, and Achilles. Such tales don’t just serve as illustrations but as proof of the transformative and sacrificial power of love. For example, Alcestis’s willingness to die for her husband transcends the emotional realm; it enters the space of the divine, and highlights love’s capability to inspire incredible acts of selflessness. This, to Phaedrus, is the ultimate power of love.

Now, it’s important to mention that Phaedrus’s interpretation of these myths isn’t without its quirks. By challenging traditional narratives, such as the relationship dynamics between Achilles and Patroclus, he offers alternative perspectives that provoke both thought and debate.

For instance, in the traditional narrative of Greek mythology, Achilles and Patroclus are usually depicted as two close friends united by their shared experiences in battle and life. But Phaedrus indicates a more intimate bond – perhaps even one of eros. Of course, this interpretation is not universally accepted. But that’s where the nature of the symposium comes in; it allows for more nuanced and exploratory approaches for endless intellectual discussion.

Phaedrus moves his argument forward by switching gears – he begins to examine the concepts of shame and honor in the context of love. On one hand, he argues that love tends to instill a deep sense of shame when it comes to dishonorable acts. But on the other hand, he explains that it also compels people toward honorable deeds. This dichotomy actually aligns with the traditional values of ancient Greek society, where honor and bravery were held in high esteem – especially in the context of how soldiers were supposed to conduct themselves. Phaedrus goes as far to suggest that if love were to guide an entire army, its power would be unstoppable. This brings love into the social and moral realm, transgressing the personal and intimate contexts we normally associate with it.

Phaedrus’s speech doesn’t just represent a collection of philosophical ideals – it also lays the groundwork for the dialogues to come. This is particularly evident in terms of what he didn’t talk about, especially his decision to only scratch the surface in differentiating between shameful and honorable acts. Additionally, his reliance on accepted societal norms sets the stage for further exploration by the other speakers in the symposium.

The dual nature of love according to Pausanias

With Phaedrus’s opening speech concluded, we’re introduced to Pausanias – a figure known mostly for being the lover of the playwright Agathon. His speech takes us further into the exploration of love; by the end, he’ll have unveiled its dual nature in a pretty provocative manner.

Pausanias starts by presenting an interesting idea – that love is actually two distinct concepts combined, and that each is associated with a different manifestation of Aphrodite, the Greek goddess of love. He calls these common love, linked to Aphrodite Pandemos, and heavenly love, associated with Aphrodite Ourania.

First, Aphrodite Pandemos represents the more earthly and physical aspect of love. This illustrates that love is accessible to everyone, and is rooted in physical attraction and desire. Moreover, it shows a type of love that is more about the body – and less about emotional or intellectual connection.

Meanwhile, Aphrodite Ourania symbolizes a more spiritual and transcendent form of love. This heavenly love goes far beyond physical attraction, into the realms of the mind and soul. It’s about forming a meaningful connection that leads to both intellectual and emotional growth. And it’s precisely this heavenly form that Pausanias argues leads to a more profound and lasting form of love. Here, it’s not only about personal fulfillment – by committing to your beloved’s own growth, you’re also contributing to the betterment of society at large.

Just as with Phaedrus, Pausanias’s arguments aren’t without their potential criticisms. His emphasis on the superiority of heavenly love, particularly in the context of sexual relationships between adult men and boys, raises questions about the societal norms in ancient Athens. His speech also reflects elitism – especially with his suggestion that true love, in its most noble, heavenly form, is only accessible to certain classes within society. In terms of our modern moral sensibilities, this clearly reveals the limitations and biases of the social contexts in which Pausanias was operating.

But there’s still some wisdom we can glean from Pausanias here – like reflecting on how we ourselves define love, and how it operates in our own lives. By presenting love as a dual entity, Pausanias invites us to dig into the nature of our relationships. What are the values that drive them? Are we pursuing superficial connections? Or are we striving for bonds that elevate us in deeper, even spiritual, ways?

Aristophanes on the innate human longing for connection

Next up? Aristophanes. In comparison to what we’ve seen so far, Aristophanes’s speech stands out with its combination of both humor and depth. Within this dichotomy, he manages to delve into the very essence of human nature and relationships. Perhaps most importantly, he introduces a fascinating concept: the idea that humans were originally dual beings, split apart and forever yearning to reunite with their other half.

The story goes like this. There was once a time when humans were spherical creatures with two sets of everything – faces, limbs, and organs. These “complete” beings, in their original form, represented a sense of wholeness that today’s humans can only ever aspire to. But due to their hubris in challenging the gods, these original beings were split in half by Zeus. And it’s precisely because of this “splitting” that we’re destined – or doomed – to spend our lives searching for our lost, other “halves.”

What’s really fascinating about Aristophanes’s story is that it functions as much more than an amusing myth; it also points toward his musings on the fragility of the human condition. In many ways, it gets to the heart of our intrinsic longing for connection – a longing that Aristophanes notes is what makes us uniquely human. This yearning, according to him, is what drives us to seek out others, to form relationships, and to find true love. We do this because we’re all, in his view, forever seeking that “other half” who will make us whole again.

It should come as no surprise that this perspective on love and human nature has wide-reaching implications. In fact, by suggesting that our search for love is an innate part of who we are, Aristophanes implies that love is a fundamental aspect of our existence. Love, therefore, isn’t just a fleeting emotion or simple attraction – it’s a deep-rooted desire for completeness. His tale also highlights the diversity of human relationships by acknowledging that the “other half” we seek could be any gender.

Still, Aristophanes’s narrative raises some important questions. Yes, it beautifully articulates the longing for a soulmate that so many of us experience – but does such a longing really lie at the heart of human fulfillment? Is completeness truly found in another person, or is it a journey that lies within ourselves? Maybe the power of Aristophanes’s narrative lies in the questions it provokes, inviting us to consider whether our pursuit of love is actually bringing us closer to the “wholeness” we seek.

Socrates’s philosophical vision of love

At last, we turn to the star of the show: Socrates, who was Plato’s famous teacher and an eminent philosopher in his own right. His discourse fuses the ideas of all those who spoke before him. The result? A profound vision of love that’s elevated from the personal and physical to the philosophical and eternal. Socrates transcends the earlier speeches – and presents love as the relentless pursuit of beauty and wisdom.

He starts off his speech with the idea that love is, at its core, a journey toward eternity. This contrasts with the transient, fleeting beauty found in love’s physical forms. Socrates, instead, speaks of a beauty that’s unchanging, timeless, and pure. This eternal beauty isn’t just an abstract concept, though; it’s a driving force that leads lovers on a transformative journey, which elevates their souls to new heights. And it’s precisely in this pursuit that love becomes a ladder – a means to ascend from the love of a single beautiful body to the love of physical beauty itself.

But he doesn’t stop there. The ladder continues until people reach an appreciation for the beauty of the soul, and even the beauty of laws and institutions. Finally, at the very top of the ladder, they’re able to love the totality of knowledge and wisdom itself. This, for Socrates, comprises the ultimate form of love.

Socrates’s approach here goes beyond the ideas presented in the earlier speeches. Where Phaedrus spoke of love as sacrifice and Pausanias distinguished between physical and spiritual love, Socrates sees things differently. For him, love is a force that encompasses all aspects of human life – a force that constantly drives us to seek out higher forms of understanding, of lusting after beauty, of searching for truth.

Love, Socrates says, engages not just the heart, but the mind and soul. It’s almost like love is an educator in his eyes: a guide that leads us through the trials and tribulations of life, a teacher that pushes us toward acquiring wisdom and appreciating true beauty.

Conclusion

Plato’s Symposium explores the many faces of love, all through the wisdom of its different speakers.

Phaedrus starts out by linking love with ancient tales, and suggests that it’s a powerful force that impacts both the human and the divine. He also challenges traditional narratives, proposing deeper meanings in relationships like that of Achilles and Patroclus.

Next up, Pausanias distinguishes between physical and spiritual love, associating them with different aspects of Aphrodite. He suggests that true love contributes to personal and social growth.

Aristophanes offers a humorous yet weighty myth that explains the roots of human longing for a soulmate – this highlights our innate desire for completeness.

Finally, Socrates takes the conversation to a new level by portraying love as a journey toward eternal beauty and wisdom. In his view, love transcends physical forms and engages the soul in the pursuit of knowledge.

All of the dialogues remain strikingly relevant to the modern world, and invite us to reflect on the complexity of love as well as our desire for connection.

About the Author

Plato

Also read: Summary: How to Think Like a Philosopher: Scholars, Dreamers and Sages Who Can Teach Us How to Live by Peter Cave